Quants tend to like either modelling some long-term average of daily squared returns (which introduced autocorrelation), or using GARCH to filter out smooth volatility process based on the data. GARCH model of daily returns, in my experience, also performed quite poorly, especially in forecasting future volatility.
Traders tend to use ATR - average true range - as a measure of price variability (quick tip: daily volatility ≈ ATR / stock price / 1.6). Another very similar estimate based on squared range, called Parkinson's volatility estimator.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c018a/c018a2bfeb9a6ddcc7cd22ab0f4ffd4d1fd75ebb" alt=""
see e.g. this.
Recently there were three interesting developments in estimators based on OHLC data.
Last year Bruno Dupire introduced what he called a Move-based estimator, a volatility estimate that reflect the cost of option hedging. I have to honestly admit, that after reviewing the presentation several times I still don't understand how the estimator is derived. If you can explain it to me, please email or comment below.
Jerzy Pawlowski created a skew-like and moment like estimators based on OHLC data, here slides 6 and 7, with R code available here.
Finally, not quite recent (2008) but also important is this correlation formula from Rogers and Zhou.
How do you go about calculating 30 days rolling volatility if you have weekly data
ReplyDeleteIf you only have weekly closing prices, then there are just too few observations to get a meaningful estimate. If you have weekly OHLC data, then absolutely use the formulas that I mentioned, as if your observations came from daily data.
ReplyDeleteIn literature, use weekly data to calculate every week's volatility (Parkinson), so formula just have one highest and lowest price in one week. I don't sure "N" in formula how to determine. Is all trading days in that week? like 5 days? Author says he want to account for impact of different number of trading days on weekly volatility. Thank you!
ReplyDelete